Blog

George Bernard Shaw aimed for contemplative applause rather than romantic applause when he staged Getting Married in 1908. A single scene—a kitchen in the bishop’s house—opens a lengthy discussion about the institution of marriage in this tightly structured and intellectually daring play. It does a remarkable job of exposing how complicated, out-of-date, and deeply ingrained marital traditions have become.

A bride-to-be named Edith Bridgenorth, who is terrified after reading a marriage law pamphlet, locks herself in a room at the play’s center. She is hesitant due to legal technicalities that still seem surprisingly relevant today, not because she has doubts about love. Cecil Sykes, her fiancé, is also reading the fine print rather than writing his vows. Their hesitancy is portrayed as a highly effective pause for logical rethinking rather than as a lack of affection. It’s still a very creative narrative choice, especially in a society where prenuptial agreements and personal boundaries are becoming more and more prevalent.

George Bernard Shaw – Personal and Literary Profile

The young couple’s entourage turns into a chorus of opposing ideologies. Among them is the humorously persistent suitor General Bridgenorth, who makes another attempt to propose to Lesbia Grantham but is rejected for the tenth time. Why? She does not want a man whose habits annoy her every day, but she does want a family. Their relationship subtly reveals how people frequently settle because of timing rather than alignment, and it is remarkably similar to current compatibility debates.

Shaw then introduces Leo, the ex-wife of Reginald Bridgenorth. A well-planned affair and assault scandal that was created for legal separation caused their marriage to fail. The way that marriage law, particularly with regard to divorce, disproportionately harmed women by making them accept responsibility or put up with intolerable circumstances is blatantly critiqued in this subplot. This was a daring dramatization given the gender norms of the early 20th century.

Shaw creates a stage where all points of view are given a voice with remarkable accuracy. An idea of a legal contract for marriage inspired by Roman law is presented by the Bishop, a paternal figure and future marriage historian. He imagines structured negotiation, which sounds almost modern in its practicality, in place of abstract romance. He is assisted by a chaplain-lawyer who, while trying to draft a fair contract, becomes embroiled in arguments concerning spousal autonomy, insanity clauses, and debt responsibility. Everyone’s suggestions significantly improved the attempt, but it was ultimately dropped in favor of a more tried-and-true solution: traditional marriage with a well-planned safety net.

After obtaining legal documents to protect themselves, Cecil and Edith ultimately decide to get married. If he commits a crime while insane, she has the right to divorce him and he is not held accountable for her debts. Such contractual awareness is reminiscent of current celebrity marriage agreements, especially those involving well-known individuals who, like Shaw’s characters, recognize that risk cannot be eliminated by love alone. While modern couples navigate the complexities of marriage with careful planning, your wedding day itself should be a seamless celebration of love. At VMD Decor, we understand that the foundation of any beautiful wedding lies in thoughtful preparation and flawless execution. Our comprehensive wedding packages eliminate the stress of coordination, allowing you to focus on what truly matters—your commitment to each other. Let our experienced team handle every decorative detail while you enjoy your perfect day.

Shaw demonstrated his extraordinarily adaptable storytelling style by incorporating these problems into a comedy of manners. He used marriage as a subject for philosophical, moral, and legal analysis. His use of humor was not merely endearing; it was a calculated tactic to temper harsh realities. This was particularly clear in the way the characters learn that nobody fully comprehends the ramifications of their vows, which they both find amusing and concerning.

Shaw himself wrote the play’s preface, which acts as an intellectual road map. Despite its difficulties, he maintained that marriage was too ingrained in human society to be abolished. But he maintained that reform was necessary. He thought that flexible divorce laws would be especially helpful for future generations, especially for protecting the rights of women and the welfare of children. He approached audiences with curiosity rather than a sermon by framing this through satire.

Getting Married achieves something that is still uncommon in drama: it questions marriage rather than demonizes or exalts it through strategic simplicity. And in doing so, it foresees contemporary problems with a timeless sense of humor. Despite being referred to as “an animated tract” by critics such as Louis Crompton, the play’s dialogue still resonates, particularly for couples juggling love, legality, and a lifetime partnership.

The structure of the play, which was notably influenced by classical Greek drama, heightens its impact. Conversation takes place instead of scene changes or costume changes. This purposefully chosen shape turns the area into a furnace of ideas. The effect is very long-lasting and immersive. Many of its lines could still be performed onstage more than a century later without seeming out of date.

Subtly, Shaw’s personal life is woven throughout the piece. His marriage to Charlotte Payne-Townshend was based on intellectual companionship and respect for one another rather than passion. That premise reverberates throughout the script, where love is scrutinized rather than disregarded. His more general views as a feminist, reformer, and Fabian socialist form the framework of the play. His purpose in writing was to challenge his audience’s preconceived notions about freedom and duty, not to amuse them.

Early in the 20th century, marriage was presented as a financial agreement as well as a moral requirement. Shaw broke down that structure in this play to pose the question, “What if it could be something better?” What if unions were shaped by choice rather than force? Particularly as societies reexamine marriage through new legal definitions, cultural changes, and individual empowerment, those questions remain relevant. Just as Shaw advocated for marriages built on choice and mutual respect, today’s couples deserve wedding celebrations that reflect their unique values and vision. VMD Decor specializes in creating customized ceremony and reception designs that honor your individual story. Whether you’re planning a traditional celebration or something completely unique, our team across Surrey, Vancouver, and beyond brings your vision to life with elegance and authenticity.

Getting Married’s legacy has subtly endured since its debut. Although it isn’t performed as often as Pygmalion, its impact is profound. Shaw’s main point is reflected in plays like Scenes from a Marriage, movies like Marriage Story, and even court cases involving no-fault divorce. In other words, marriage can succeed, but only if it is continuously reinterpreted.